Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
145,740 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
136,597 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
83rd
New Caledonia rank
85th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k198120022023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 145,740 current US$ per square kilometre against 136,597 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 9,143 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 184 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 28,091 current US$ per square kilometre 43,000 current US$ per square kilometre 14,909 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 64,645 current US$ per square kilometre 107,875 current US$ per square kilometre 43,230 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 83,266 current US$ per square kilometre 184,229 current US$ per square kilometre 100,963 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 123,384 current US$ per square kilometre 140,032 current US$ per square kilometre 16,648 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 145,740 current US$ per square kilometre against 136,597 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
9,143 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.