Australia vs Uganda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Australia
53,831 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
55,491 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
120th
Uganda rank
118th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 55,491 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,831 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 1,660 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 120th and Uganda ranks 118th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,112 current US$ per square kilometre 482.66 current US$ per square kilometre 629.53 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 3,138 current US$ per square kilometre 916.98 current US$ per square kilometre 2,221 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 7,223 current US$ per square kilometre 1,676 current US$ per square kilometre 5,547 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 11,737 current US$ per square kilometre 3,960 current US$ per square kilometre 7,777 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 23,047 current US$ per square kilometre 11,700 current US$ per square kilometre 11,348 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 46,828 current US$ per square kilometre 39,692 current US$ per square kilometre 7,135 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 47,807 current US$ per square kilometre 51,144 current US$ per square kilometre 3,337 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 55,491 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,831 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Uganda?
1,660 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 120th and Uganda ranks 118th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uganda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/uganda/">Australia vs Uganda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.