South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

South Asia
0.2945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.3666 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Asia rank
8th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
9th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • South Asia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.30.40.50.6196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.3666 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia, a difference of 0.0721 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

South Asia ranks 8th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th of 40 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Asia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0273 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Asia
2000s 0.3764 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2742 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1022 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Asia
2010s 0.3211 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.327 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.2909 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3588 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0678 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, South Asia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.3666 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0721 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
South Asia ranks 8th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia/tanzania/">South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,385 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.