How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Namibia?

46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ireland vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Ireland

0.1679 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Namibia

0.1678 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Ireland rank

94th

Namibia rank

95th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Ireland
Namibia

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.1679 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1678 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 94th and Namibia ranks 95th of 163 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ireland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.5551 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.185 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3701 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1990s	0.2993 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.17 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1294 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
2000s	0.2523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2129 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0394 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
2010s	0.2506 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2067 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0439 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
2020s	0.2169 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1968 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0201 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Ireland or Namibia?: Ireland, at 0.1679 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1678 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Ireland and Namibia?: 0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Namibia?: 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Namibia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Ireland ranks 94th and Namibia ranks 95th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/namibia/">Ireland vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 8,385 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.