Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.2309 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.2868 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
24th
Rwanda rank
27th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Rwanda
0.10.20.3196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.2868 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2309 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0559 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 40 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2366 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1973 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0393 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 0.2531 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2274 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0257 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 0.2505 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2721 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0216 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.2868 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2309 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda?
0.0559 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/rwanda/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,385 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.