How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Chile

0.2056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Latvia

0.2098 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

68th

Latvia rank

66th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.2098 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0.0042 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 68th and Latvia ranks 66th of 163 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.2746 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3805 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2000s	0.3014 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.435 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2010s	0.2383 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2355 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0028 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
2020s	0.2129 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2229 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Chile or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.2098 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Chile and Latvia?: 0.0042 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 68th and Latvia ranks 66th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 8,385 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.