Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Tajikistan
32,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
32,271 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan rank
120th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
119th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 32,271 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 42 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 120th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 119th of 160 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 30,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,379 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2000s 12,085 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,051 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,034 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2010s 21,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2020s 32,127 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,943 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Tajikistan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 32,271 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 32,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
42 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Tajikistan ranks 120th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 119th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tajikistan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tajikistan/tanzania/">Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.