Philippines vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Philippines
322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
345,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines rank
46th
Sweden rank
45th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Philippines
  • Sweden
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 345,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 22,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Philippines ranks 46th and Sweden ranks 45th of 160 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 50,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 133,749 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 60,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 144,554 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 78,698 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 162,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 96,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 219,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 122,646 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 225,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 285,632 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 60,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 279,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 344,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Philippines or Sweden?
Sweden, at 345,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Philippines and Sweden?
22,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Sweden rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Philippines ranks 46th and Sweden ranks 45th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/philippines/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/philippines/sweden/">Philippines vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.