Norway vs Philippines: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Norway
300,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
49th
Philippines rank
46th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Philippines
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 300,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 21,878 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 46th of 160 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 127,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 50,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 77,793 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 154,346 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 60,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 93,848 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 165,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,698 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 86,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 233,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 96,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 136,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 287,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 225,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 61,990 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 299,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 279,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Norway or Philippines?
Philippines, at 322,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 300,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Norway and Philippines?
21,878 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Philippines?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Philippines rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 46th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Philippines: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/philippines/">Norway vs Philippines: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.