Libya vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Libya
4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
4,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
149th
Namibia rank
150th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k198020012023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 150th of 160 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 6,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 5,076 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,817 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Libya and Namibia?
186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 150th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.