Late-demographic dividend vs Luxembourg: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Late-demographic dividend
205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg
4.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
14th
Luxembourg rank
11th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Luxembourg
02.0M4.0M6.0M199520092023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 4.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 4.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 20.6 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th and Luxembourg ranks 11th of 40 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 60,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 145,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 194,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Late-demographic dividend or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 4.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Late-demographic dividend and Luxembourg?
4.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Luxembourg rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th and Luxembourg ranks 11th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Luxembourg: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/luxembourg/">Late-demographic dividend vs Luxembourg: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.