Kiribati vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Kiribati
88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
81st
Nepal rank
84th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nepal
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200120122023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 5,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 84th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 26,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,289 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 57,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 400.51 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 64,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 86,569 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,567 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Nepal?
Kiribati, at 88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Nepal?
5,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nepal?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Nepal rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 84th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/nepal/">Kiribati vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.