Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
27,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation
26,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
124th
Russian Federation rank
126th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Russian Federation
010.0k20.0k30.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 27,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 26,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation, a difference of 973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Russian Federation ranks 126th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 5,085 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,221 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,136 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2000s 8,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,213 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,575 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 17,998 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,255 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2020s 24,506 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,416 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Russian Federation?
Kazakhstan, at 27,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 26,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Russian Federation rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Russian Federation ranks 126th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/">Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.