Japan vs Late-demographic dividend: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Japan
3.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend
205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
14th
Late-demographic dividend rank
14th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Late-demographic dividend
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M197019962023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 3.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 16.8 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 14th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 160 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 3.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,943 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 3.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 60,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 3.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 145,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.04 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 3.39 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 194,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Japan or Late-demographic dividend?
Japan, at 3.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 205,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Japan and Late-demographic dividend?
3.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Late-demographic dividend?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Japan and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 14th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Late-demographic dividend: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/japan/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/japan/late-demographic-dividend/">Japan vs Late-demographic dividend: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.