Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
13,470 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
391,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
39th
Poland rank
42nd

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Poland
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199520092023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 391,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,470 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 377,809 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 29.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th and Poland ranks 42nd of 40 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 5,700 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 253,760 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 248,060 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 9,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 319,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 310,101 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 12,605 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 415,212 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 402,607 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Poland?
Poland, at 391,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,470 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
377,809 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th and Poland ranks 42nd of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/poland/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.