Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
8,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
141st

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199720102023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 5,303 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 6,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 634.08 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 7,417 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,463 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
2,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.