Germany vs Low & middle income: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Germany
2.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
150,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
17th
Low & middle income rank
19th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Germany
  • Low & middle income
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019962023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 2.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 150,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 2.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 14.7 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 17th and Low & middle income ranks 19th of 160 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 1.87 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,228 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 1.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,679 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 1.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 109,735 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.88 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 2.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 142,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Germany or Low & middle income?
Germany, at 2.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 150,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Germany and Low & middle income?
2.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Low & middle income?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Germany and Low & middle income rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Germany ranks 17th and Low & middle income ranks 19th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Low & middle income: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/low-and-middle-income/">Germany vs Low & middle income: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.