How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Lithuania?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Lithuania: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Finland

179,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

185,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Finland rank

61st

Lithuania rank

60th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

Finland
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 185,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 179,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 5,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 61st and Lithuania ranks 60th of 160 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	122,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	49,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	72,582 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Finland
2000s	167,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	97,051 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	70,020 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Finland
2010s	182,026 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	135,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	46,998 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Finland
2020s	198,365 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	179,452 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	18,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Finland or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 185,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 179,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Finland and Lithuania?: 5,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Lithuania?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Finland and Lithuania rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?: Finland ranks 61st and Lithuania ranks 60th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Lithuania: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/lithuania/">Finland vs Lithuania: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.