Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 11,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,426 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 215,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 211,908 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 148,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 143,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 24,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 8,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 15,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 11,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 1,426 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.