Egypt vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
49,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
55,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
102nd
Iceland rank
99th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Iceland
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 55,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 6,006 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Egypt ranks 102nd and Iceland ranks 99th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 3,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,945 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,236 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 13,928 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,854 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 17,579 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,654 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 31,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,017 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 50,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 53,694 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,512 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or Iceland?
Iceland, at 55,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and Iceland?
6,006 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 102nd and Iceland ranks 99th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/">Egypt vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.