Cuba vs Oman: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
82,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
86th
Oman rank
85th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Oman
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 82,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 2,984 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Oman ahead.

Cuba ranks 86th and Oman ranks 85th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 32,345 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 352.5 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 45,413 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 44,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 719.91 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 74,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 87,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 80,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 85,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Oman?
Oman, at 82,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Oman?
2,984 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Oman rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 86th and Oman ranks 85th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Oman: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/">Cuba vs Oman: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.