Cuba vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
86th
Nepal rank
84th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Nepal
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 4,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 84th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 46,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 74,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,704 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 80,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 86,569 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Nepal?
Nepal, at 83,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Nepal?
4,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nepal?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Nepal rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 84th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nepal/">Cuba vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.