Cuba vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
86th
Morocco rank
83rd

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Morocco
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196619942023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 6,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 86th and Morocco ranks 83rd of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Morocco Difference Ahead
1970s 53,837 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,113 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,724 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 87,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 71,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 43,567 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 45,413 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48.45 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 74,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,318 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 80,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,838 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Morocco?
Morocco, at 86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 79,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Morocco?
6,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Morocco?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Morocco rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 86th and Morocco ranks 83rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/morocco/">Cuba vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.