Congo vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Congo
10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
141st
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9,701 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2010s | 18,087 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 12,559 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 9,109 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 8,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 228.96 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.