Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Congo
10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
11,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
140th
Equatorial Guinea rank
139th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 11,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 1,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 140th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th of 160 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 10,875 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 162,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 151,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 18,087 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 148,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 130,716 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 9,109 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,597 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 11,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
1,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 140th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.