Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
8,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
141st

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199320082023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 2,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,520 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 7,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,701 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
1,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.