China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

China
747,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
20,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
31st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
33rd

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199520092023

How they compare

China currently reports 747,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 726,912 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 35.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 33rd of 160 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 191,596 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 181,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 504,797 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,604 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 488,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 712,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,474 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 692,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, China or Sub-Saharan Africa?
China, at 747,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
726,912 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 33rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sub-saharan-africa/">China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.