Central African Republic vs Greenland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
531.13 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
2,540 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
159th
Greenland rank
157th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200320132023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 2,540 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 531.13 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 2,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 4.8 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 159th and Greenland ranks 157th of 160 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 463.6 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,726 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 562.25 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,416 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 571.57 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Greenland, at 2,540 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 531.13 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Greenland?
2,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 159th and Greenland ranks 157th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.