Brunei Darussalam vs Czechia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Brunei Darussalam
782,571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia
838,750 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brunei Darussalam rank
30th
Czechia rank
28th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Czechia
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M1.2M199020062023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 838,750 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 782,571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 56,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Brunei Darussalam's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 30th and Czechia ranks 28th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Darussalam Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 623,058 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 399,520 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 223,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brunei Darussalam
2000s 467,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 556,746 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 89,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 900,174 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 635,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 264,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brunei Darussalam
2020s 820,226 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 806,384 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,842 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brunei Darussalam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Brunei Darussalam or Czechia?
Czechia, at 838,750 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 782,571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brunei Darussalam as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Brunei Darussalam and Czechia?
56,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Brunei Darussalam and Czechia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 30th and Czechia ranks 28th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei Darussalam vs Czechia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brunei-darussalam/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brunei-darussalam/czechia/">Brunei Darussalam vs Czechia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.