Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
34,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
111th
Tunisia rank
113th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196519942023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 1,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Brazil ranks 111th and Tunisia ranks 113th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 16,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,008 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 19,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 24,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,587 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 31,224 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,264 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 40,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 37,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Tunisia?
Brazil, at 35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Tunisia?
1,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 111th and Tunisia ranks 113th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/">Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.