Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
9,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
141st

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197519992023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 4,529 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 6,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 8,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9.14 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 10,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.