Belgium vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Belgium
4.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics
336,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
13th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
10th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199520092023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 4.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 336,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 12.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 13th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 10th of 160 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
2000s 2.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 216,382 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 3.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 267,610 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 3.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 342,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Belgium or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Belgium, at 4.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 336,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Belgium and Central Europe and the Baltics?
3.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Central Europe and the Baltics?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 13th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 10th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Belgium vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.