Argentina vs Brazil: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
39,219 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
109th
Brazil rank
111th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Brazil
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 39,219 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 3,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 111th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Brazil Difference Ahead
1970s 18,695 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 16,029 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 20,207 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,905 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 23,673 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,224 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 36,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,236 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 35,566 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Brazil?
Argentina, at 39,219 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 35,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Brazil?
3,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 111th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.