Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
213.14 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
241.44 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k200520152025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 241.44 constant 2015 US$ per person against 213.14 constant 2015 US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 28.3 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 163 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 5,317 constant 2015 US$ per person 98.94 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,218 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 3,128 constant 2015 US$ per person 149.02 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,978 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 365.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 220.47 constant 2015 US$ per person 145.39 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 241.44 constant 2015 US$ per person against 213.14 constant 2015 US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
28.3 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,396 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.