Early-demographic dividend vs France: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
1,084 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
France
8,580 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
26th
France rank
26th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • France
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196019922025

How they compare

France currently reports 8,580 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,084 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 7,496 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes France's figure about 7.9 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and France ranks 26th of 40 groups.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend France Difference Ahead
1960s 302.89 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,430 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,127 constant 2015 US$ per person France
1970s 525.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,085 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,559 constant 2015 US$ per person France
1980s 829.16 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,307 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,478 constant 2015 US$ per person France
1990s 696.19 constant 2015 US$ per person 6,128 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,431 constant 2015 US$ per person France
2000s 382.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,695 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,312 constant 2015 US$ per person France
2010s 888.09 constant 2015 US$ per person 8,027 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,139 constant 2015 US$ per person France
2020s 988.44 constant 2015 US$ per person 8,558 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,570 constant 2015 US$ per person France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or France?
France, at 8,580 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,084 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and France?
7,496 constant 2015 US$ per person, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and France?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and France rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and France ranks 26th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs France: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/france/">Early-demographic dividend vs France: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,396 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.