Lithuania vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre

Lithuania
2.02 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
53rd
Panama rank
51st

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Panama
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199520092023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 2.02 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 49,390 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 51st of 156 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 758,752 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 480,296 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 278,456 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 1.20 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 714,635 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 489,159 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 1.61 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 1.44 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 174,202 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 1.97 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 1.80 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 167,390 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre, Lithuania or Panama?
Panama, at 2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 2.02 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre between Lithuania and Panama?
49,390 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 51st of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/panama/">Lithuania vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,996 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.