Kazakhstan vs Tanzania: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
245,462 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
257,930 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
129th
Tanzania rank
128th

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Tanzania
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 257,930 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 245,462 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 12,468 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 129th and Tanzania ranks 128th of 156 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 59,624 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 51,068 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 8,556 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 94,050 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 90,297 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 3,753 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 178,481 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 169,326 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 9,156 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 225,183 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 241,569 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 16,386 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 257,930 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 245,462 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Tanzania?
12,468 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Tanzania rank globally for gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 129th and Tanzania ranks 128th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Tanzania: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/">Kazakhstan vs Tanzania: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,996 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.