Japan vs Mauritius: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre

Japan
16.91 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
16.63 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
15th
Mauritius rank
16th

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Mauritius
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020062023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 16.91 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 16.63 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 280,300 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 156 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 14.29 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 7.18 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 7.11 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 15.17 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 10.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 5.10 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 15.95 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 15.17 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 775,690 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 16.54 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 15.96 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 583,625 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre, Japan or Mauritius?
Japan, at 16.91 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 16.63 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre between Japan and Mauritius?
280,300 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritius?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Japan and Mauritius rank globally for gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Mauritius: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/japan/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/japan/mauritius/">Japan vs Mauritius: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,996 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.