Guatemala vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre

Guatemala
2.06 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
52nd
Panama rank
51st

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Panama
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199020062023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 2.06 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 12,330 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 52nd and Panama ranks 51st of 156 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 846,918 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 480,296 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 366,622 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 714,635 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 358,903 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1.53 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 1.44 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 85,999 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1.92 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 1.80 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 118,870 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Panama?
Panama, at 2.07 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 2.06 million constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Panama?
12,330 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Panama rank globally for gni, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 52nd and Panama ranks 51st of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/panama/">Guatemala vs Panama: GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,996 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.