Japan vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Japan
1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
0.9095 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan rank
5th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
5th

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Japan
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
00.511.52199420092024

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9095 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 0.2705 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ahead.

Japan ranks 5th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 5th of 161 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9211 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6436 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
2010s 0.8698 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1396 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
2020s 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.949 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0888 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Japan or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
Japan, at 1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9095 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Japan and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
0.2705 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Japan and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Japan ranks 5th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 5th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/">Japan vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,858 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.