What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Botswana and Ecuador?

0.0052 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?

50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Ecuador: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Botswana

0.8709 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ecuador

0.8761 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Botswana rank

57th

Ecuador rank

55th

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Botswana
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.8761 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8709 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Botswana, a difference of 0.0052 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 161 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1970s	1.86 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.76 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8983 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1980s	1.2 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8378 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1990s	1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.88 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8083 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2000s	0.9104 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.61 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7033 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2010s	0.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1294 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2020s	0.8867 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9304 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0437 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Botswana or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 0.8761 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8709 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Botswana and Ecuador?: 0.0052 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Botswana ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 6,858 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.