South Africa vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

South Africa
303,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
92nd

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 303,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 769 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 71,859 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,747 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 100,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,387 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 131,533 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 96,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,602 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 147,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 137,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 202,236 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 211,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,495 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 276,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 282,916 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 298,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 289,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, South Africa or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 303,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between South Africa and Tunisia?
769 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/">South Africa vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.