Guatemala vs Mexico: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
749,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
703,506 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
61st
Mexico rank
62nd

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mexico
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 749,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 703,506 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 46,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Guatemala ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 62nd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 98,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,977 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,425 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 162,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 200,607 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,994 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 194,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 297,968 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 270,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 382,945 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 112,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 390,526 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 522,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 132,273 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 555,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 606,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 51,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 699,379 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 641,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,298 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Mexico?
Guatemala, at 749,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 703,506 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Mexico?
46,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mexico rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 62nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mexico: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/">Guatemala vs Mexico: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.