Euro area vs Singapore: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Euro area
4.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
486.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Euro area
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 486.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 481.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 104.0 times Euro area's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 26 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 2.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 2.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 66.70 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 64.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 3.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 157.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 154.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 3.82 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 263.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 259.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 4.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 405.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 400.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 4.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 475.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 470.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Euro area or Singapore?
Singapore, at 486.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Euro area and Singapore?
481.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Singapore?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Singapore rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Euro area ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Singapore: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/singapore/">Euro area vs Singapore: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.