Congo vs Madagascar: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Congo
27,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
22,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
147th
Madagascar rank
150th

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Madagascar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 27,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 22,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 5,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Congo ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 150th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 4,106 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 5,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,865 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 10,972 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,337 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,635 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 9,294 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 599.44 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 19,727 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,029 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,698 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 36,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,723 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 27,047 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,930 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,117 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Madagascar?
Congo, at 27,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 22,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Madagascar?
5,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Madagascar rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 150th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Madagascar: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/madagascar/">Congo vs Madagascar: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.