Colombia vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
329,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
89th
Tunisia rank
92nd

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196519942023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 329,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 25,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Tunisia ahead.

Colombia ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 39,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 812.2 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 58,414 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,387 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 973.03 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 85,165 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 96,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 121,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 137,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 157,915 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 211,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 253,559 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 282,916 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,356 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 304,724 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 289,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Tunisia?
Colombia, at 329,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 303,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Tunisia?
25,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tunisia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tunisia rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/">Colombia vs Tunisia: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.