Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
339.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Hong Kong rank
3rd

GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199320082023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 339.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 338.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 232.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 26 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 640,977 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 175.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 174.38 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 848,763 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 221.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 220.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 298.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 297.05 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 330.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 329.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 339.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong?
338.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.