Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Malta
9.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend
292,621 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
Post-demographic dividend rank
3rd

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Malta
  • Post-demographic dividend
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 9.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 292,621 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 9.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 33.5 times Post-demographic dividend's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 166 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
2000s 4.05 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.83 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 5.93 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 252,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 9.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 284,624 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Malta or Post-demographic dividend?
Malta, at 9.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 292,621 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Malta and Post-demographic dividend?
9.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Post-demographic dividend?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Malta and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Malta ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/post-demographic-dividend/">Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.