Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Guinea
8,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
8,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
144th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
145th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020062023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 8,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 324 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Guinea ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 1,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 5,970 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2020s 8,531 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,114 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,417 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Guinea, at 8,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
324 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Guinea ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/">Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.