Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Guinea-Bissau
9,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
141st
Kazakhstan rank
138th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kazakhstan
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 563 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 138th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 2,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,500 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 484.45 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 3,964 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,109 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 144.26 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 6,522 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,310 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 788.19 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 9,582 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92.34 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Guinea-Bissau or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
563 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 138th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/kazakhstan/">Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.